So You wish to be A Lawyer. What you have to understand.
Have you got ten years experience?
When you have less than this then your life as a lawyer will probably be greatly more difficult to start out with. The Legal profession do not view 2:2 degrees as being something that entitles you to practice as an attorney. It is going to go against you for the rest of your career and there’s no way round it. I suspect that in case you are sat there reading this with a 2:2 degree anyone who has told you to go into the legal profession has misinformed you. It’s not hopeless – I have trained and coached many students and graduates who’ve 2:2 degrees (sometimes a 3rd) and they have gone onto enjoy rewarding careers as attorneys in some capacity. However, their road into law has been considerably harder as an effect of their inability to obtain a 2:1 degree.
So getting back to my statement that in case you have exceptional academics you need to always consider becoming a solicitor by going down the Legal Executive route, so as not to damage your job in the long term.
In case you do not have exceptional professors then you should consider alternative options and one of these will be to go down the legal executive route.
However I would not recommend paying until you have legal work experience to undertake a legal executive class, you are able to use in the longer duration to secure yourself a profession that is legal that is good.
By this I mean that in the event you are a student or graduate you must definitely not go direct along to the Institute of Legal Executives and sign up for any legal executive class. If you are going down a non-conventional route into law then academic study when you have finished an undergraduate degree or your A-Levels is wholly immaterial. Encounter is what matters and nothing else will do. Legal work experience is the key to gaining a successful start into law.
You can’t skip this, circumvent or browse round it as every year tries.
This is why academic institutions have been bought out by overseas firms looking to make a fast buck.
There are lots of people out there undertaking postgraduate and undergraduate classes without a hope at all of finding a job in the profession they are going into.
Moreover, there are many folks out there who possess the academic qualifications but lack any work experience or actions or interests who similarly are hardly likely to get ahead in law or get through the simple means.
No careers advisor will give you this advice, but the main thing to do to get into law will be to get more encounter, more experience and experience. This may cost money in itself, and you might say I have to dwell and that I’ve my fees to pay. This gets me to my point that in the event that you want to invest in your job afterward spending money on academic qualifications really isn’t the way to go.
They are looking for a fee earner help and to go for a month or two with a load of admin work. They’ll pay nicely for this, and it is a job probably most suited for an LPC grad.
I have one in mind.
It isn’t an LPC grad with good A levels or a 2:1 law degree. It isn’t an LPC grad with some sort of summer school academic qualification or an LLM from an excellent university. It truly is an LPC grad with similar experience to that the business are seeking.
They’ll examine the LPC grad’s work experience to date to decide whether to choose them on for this kind of job although the business will not give two hoots what the LPC grad has in relation to additional qualifications.
It’s so important to understand this that when somebody says what’s the cheapest way into law that there’s no easy solution. If you liked this write-up and you would like to receive a lot more details concerning philippine Law firms kindly go to the web-page. You cannot merely take a determination now which will affect the remainder of your career simply on the basis that it may cost one or two thousand pounds more to go one way into the legal profession rather than another.
You’ll notice that so far I haven’t mentioned anything about barristers. This is because in my experience training to be a barrister is more often than not a total waste of time and your money. You would probably be shocked to hear this and perhaps put it down to my natural prejudice against barristers having been a solicitor myself. I’d grudgingly accept that probably I am a little biased against barristers having run around courts for them, I’ve dealt with some fairly dreadful ones over the years (also as some absolutely fantastic ones) but the barristers’ fibril of the field is pretty much tied up and it’s very vital that you understand this.
The word nepotism could almost have been devised for this particular portion of the field. I want to supply you with an example.
Back many years ago when myself had just qualified as a solicitor a local chambers which was probably the top group of barristers by a considerable distance and had an excellent reputation in the region were used by our practice. I cannot remember any one of their barristers being most and bungling or unsuited being incredibly gifted supporters.
There were a considerable number of uses, as you would expect because this was a high quality set of chambers, excellent reputation with quality work coming in, in a place where there are not many barristers’ chambers.
I don’t understand how the recruitment process occurred but I do know that the two students picked were kids of one of the senior barristers in chambers and among the more junior barristers. I am fearful the barristers’ profession can discuss diversity and equal opportunity to their hearts content but when recruitment like this occurs in a chambers of that size it is not completely relevant.
It is always going to be the case that if chambers at that degree recruit their own anyone else will either need to set up competing chambers or instead work for a lesser standard of chambers.
It might be that the two children of the barristers already in practice were the best suited for the role, and I am sure they went on to be completely prominent barristers but the point is these two people got their pupillages with chambers to which they were already affiliated through their parents.
With no sort or recruiting process that removes this (and after all why should it – I’d have done exactly the same myself as a barrister if my children needed to practice as barristers!) then this isn’t a strand of the profession to go into unless you have family or incredibly great friends who are able to assist you in your search or pupillage.
Barristers are not ended up as by the great majority of people who finish the Bar Professional Training Course.
It is a false economy because the price of completing the Legal Practice Course as well as the Bar Professional Training Course is verging on the absurd for the returns you can get at a later period in your job.
So in summary I urge anyone coming into the field to do one of two things.
1. In case you have exceptional academics as well as the power to add your CV to reinforce this then and legal work experience go and try and qualify as a solicitor. Do not go any other route down.
2. In the event you don’t have outstanding academics do not go down the course of qualifying to be a solicitor.
Always believe – What do you want to get out of it? How much are you going to have to earn in order to get exactly what you really want out of life?